Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: ARRL 160

To: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL 160
From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:19:44 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
In Emails with the ARRL 160M and 10M logchecker in past few years he has 
confirmed to me that their logchecking software supports XQSO: at least for 
those two contests.

Tim N3QE

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Tree <tree@kkn.net> wrote:
> 
> There is no penalty for busting a callsign - so manually entering a busted
> callsign is a perfect way to deal with the situation.  Just make one letter
> different.  Nothing lost - you just lose the QSO.
> 
> Tree
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Talk about self-sacrifice. LOL
>> 
>> If it's possible in CQ Contests, ARRL should implement it too.
>> 
>> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Another option would be to bust the other guys call (on purpose) in your
>>> log.  You take an extra "hit" - you loose the QSO, plus penalty, but it
>>> gets the job done if that is the intent.
>>> 
>>> Tom - VE3CX
>>> 
>>> 
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>> 
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>