Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L

To: "'Art Heft'" <artandkaren@gmail.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160 m inverted L
From: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:23:28 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I haven't run any numbers but it seems like you should just shorten the
horizontal wire (resonance freq is too low).  I would go back to about 65'
horizontal.  Somewhere in the range of 60' to 70' you should get close
enough.

   -------------------
Wes Attaway (N5WA)
(318) 393-3289 - Shreveport, LA
Computer/Cellphone Forensics
AttawayForensics.com
   -------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Art Heft
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 3:06 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 160 m inverted L

I finally got the inverted L up this afternoon.  Vertical dimension is 65'
and the almost horizontal dimension is 95'.  I am using a very carefully
built FCP and the commercial transformer.  My SARK 110 shows resonance at
about 1.68 MHz but the resistive part is up around 1000 ohms.  Taken right
at the antenna.  Doesn't seem right to me.  Any ideas?
73, Art K8CIT Hillman MI
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>