Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Low band antenna project questions

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Low band antenna project questions
From: Bill N6MW <billsstuffn6mw@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:37:43 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
For 160/80 some features under discussion and used, both at home and for V7, were a 55' vertical + drooping T (2x or 3x wires at ~ 45 degrees but reachable from the ground for initial tuning) + two/few experimentally tuned elevated radials for each band. The raw antenna is long on 80 and matched by a series cap (air with enough gap for power). It is short on 160 and can be matched by a hairpin coil across the input. Of course, you must somehow switch between the cap and the coil to change bands -- not completely trivial. In my case, this done by hand at the base amid the dark/rain/snakes. Especially on 80 this antenna is significantly off-center-fed and required substantial extra coax coiled up as a choke. The story is written up on my website. This method probably has limits on 80 if using just a field of 160 m ground radials, although adding a couple of elevated tuned 80m radials might do the trick - or so says standard EZNEC. EZNEC also hints that you might also be able to have a mix of 160 m and 80 m radials to get a similar effect but the limits of EZNEC when radial ground effects may be important are well known.

This antenna had acceptable (second-tier in pile ups) performance on 160m using 700 watts and was quite good on 80. The V7 version with 2 drooping T wires and 2 elevated radials for each band was just okay on 160 but good on 80, probably limited by trees proximity and restricted geometry, although some might claim enhanced by being on a beach with adjacent ocean.

Bill N6MW

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>