To: | Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>, topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: RDF in the real-world |
From: | "K1FZ-Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net> |
Reply-to: | k1fz@myfairpoint.net |
Date: | Fri, 04 Mar 2016 10:02:22 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I agree. There are times, especially in disturbed condx, when my BOG antennas are "head and shoulders" better than my other antennas. 73 Bruce-K1FZ www.qsl.net/k1fz/bogantennanotes.htmlI can't vouch for JC's numbers (his numbers may be QTH specific), but the concept is believable since the theoretical assumption of isotropic noise falls apart in the real-world. My BOG *at times* gives much more of an SNR improvement than the SAL-20 (using measurements on a calibrated S-meter) inspite of the small difference in RDF between the BOG and SAL-20. Carl K9LA _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar), Tim Shoppa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Ever experimented with a Gieskieng or modified Gieskieng antenna?????????, James Rodenkirch |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: RDF in the real-world, Carl Luetzelschwab |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: RDF in the real-world, JC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |