Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Fw: Am I the only one in step?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Fw: Am I the only one in step?
From: "Pete Bertini" <radioconnection@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:29:32 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Oh, boo hoo. So reduce the CW band to 10 kHz.
Geeez.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Fw: Am I the only one in step?


On Tue,3/1/2016 10:03 AM, Pete Bertini wrote:
It seems odd to me that 160 meters shouldn't be allowed an exclusive FCC CW assignment for at least 20 to 50 kHz on the bottom edge?

Have you slept through the many emails in this thread noting that many hams in different parts of the world have very limited bandwidth on 160M? It has been observed that EU hams have only 1810 to 1850 for ALL forms of modulation on 160M.

73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>