They had huge signal on 160M here in W3 last night.
On 80M... my unconfirmed suspicion is that they have one ?Battle Creek
Special? and maybe one ?lowband receive system?, and cannot activate both
160M and 80M simultaneously with the good stuff.
Right now the stats in clublog say they 120 in zone 3 on 160M, but only 23
in zone 3 on 80M.
They certainly had the good stuff on 160M last night! Their signal was
entirely comparable to that E5 activation in October on that first
exceptional morning.
Tim N3QE
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net> wrote:
> I was surprised how much stronger they are here on TB than on 80.
>
> Art NK8X
>
> ᐧ
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Mike via Topband <topband@contesting.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > What a run K5P has had on 160 the last 2 nights! I run an inverted L
> with
> > the vertical portion up 65" and 90 radials of which 60 are 120'. It's
> not
> > a bad Tx ant, but not so hot on Rx, and I need a bit better Wx to put up
> > the Hi-Z array I bought. I usually hear stations in the pacific for 30-
> > 60
> > min before my sunrise here in the black hole of DX in southern Michigan
> > and
> > they are only workable for 15-30 min. These guys were workable for
> hours
> > prior to my sunrise (worked them @ 0530 EST, 1030Z, 2.5h before sunrise,
> > 550
> > W) and I heard them for an hour after when most stations fade within
> > minutes after sunrise. Impressive.
> >
> > Mike KD8RQE
> > _________________
> > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> >
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|