1810 or 1809.9 is a good spot because it is the limit of many EU TB'ers
and fewer East Coast big guns are parking there calling endless CQ's.
I used to have fun working on the higher bands nearby stations using a
light build (dummy load). This could be a 20X or 100X mult but let's
hope not. Then how about just coupling into the power box with some
blocking capacitors if you live in the country and can't get up a wire.
Problem with that is the performance would be an infinite numbers of
variables each one would be infinitely variable.
There has to be a "no antenna at all" award in the works.☺
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 12/24/2015 2:31 PM, Barry N1EU wrote:
Rumor says that it's 1810KHz but I don't really see it being relevant in
TBDC
73, Barry N1EU
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:23 PM, jh-mty@sbcglobal.net <jh-mty@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
Me neither. And Jim B is a QRPer (howdy from PG, Jim), so pray-tell....de
W6UQZ
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: QRPers calling CQ in the SP ?
On Thu,12/24/2015 10:03 AM, Jim F. via Topband wrote:
Will try to make an attempt this year on the hour around the QRPwatering
hole. (QRPers know where that is ! )
I don't. And why conceal it?
73, Jim K9YC
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|