To: | "'Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA'" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. |
From: | "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net> |
Date: | Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:46:33 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I can speculate that your mail box would be overflowing and you could retire comfortably especially if you had a 160m station that worked. Sri Tom, I couldn't resist having some fun. Doug -----Original Message----- 24 hours and even not one comment? Maybe I really should've said I was renting the station out for hire to offshore stns only, to be used to work rare countries, during contests for DXCC credits to put them at the top of the honor roll... VE9AA Mike, Coreen & Corey Keswick Ridge, NB --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length., W0MU Mike Fatchett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: [Bulk] Improving low angle reception DX Eng 8 ele Circle RCV Array, Grant Saviers |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length., W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length., Yuri Blanarovich |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |