To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project |
From: | Dave Bowker via Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Dave Bowker <david.bowker@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:23:57 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
IMHO, the K1N 'DQRM Tracking Project' is fostering perpetrators to flex their muscle and mettle and challenge the status quo. The K1N web site proclamation " the objective is to identify stations who are acting as DQRMers and use legal means to stop this behavior" is illogical, without basis and merit, and unenforceable. What court of law would such a case be heard in? What defense and due process does a 'falsely accused' have? What are the legal ramifications upon the accuser of unfounded false or erroneously made allegations? Dave, K1FKFort Kent, ME _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project, Mike Waters |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Tensioning of RG58 coax for 2-way Beverage, Roger D Johnson |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Deliberate interference, Larry via Topband |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Elimination of Treadmill RFI on 160 meters, Don Kirk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |