Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Inverted L question

To: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Inverted L question
From: James Bennett <w6jhb@me.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:58:37 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Art, from what I’ve read, I understand that the non-vertical part of the 
Inverted L does not have to be completely horizontal - it can slope with little 
detriment to it’s radiation pattern. I have two - one for 80 and one for 160. 
Both of ‘em slope away from the top support.

Jim / W6JHB


> On   Tuesday, Feb 3, 2015, at  Tuesday, 1:55 PM, Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> I have been looking at locations on my property to install an Inverted L
> for 160.
> 
> How important is it for the top part to be led away at a right angle?
> 
> I was considering running it vertically 80ft, then about 25 feet at a 45
> degree up angle and 25 feet at a 45 degree down angle, over the top of the
> supporting tree.
> 
> de Art NK8X
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>