To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2014 07:52:03 -0800 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Sun,12/21/2014 6:11 AM, Mack McCormick wrote: I've been carefully following the discussion about the merits of various 8 element arrays and beverages. I suggest that you study W3LPL's excellent presentation on 160M RX antennas from K3LR's Contest University at Dayton this past spring. The various systems each have their merits, which depend upon their surroundings. I have reversible Beverages using DXE hardware, and my property is not hospitable to arrays of verticals. If my property were different, I'd strongly consider one of the vertical arrays. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving, Mack McCormick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Non-resonant receive antennas, JC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving, Mack McCormick |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Recommended Antennas for 160M/80M Receiving, Roger D Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |