I’m finalizing design for my 160M/80M shortened wire tree-mounted
vertical. An Unadilla 80M trap will be
placed approx. 65’ feet above the feedpoint; above the trap is another 20
feet
with a small cap hat. An autotuner
handles the Z matching for the anticipated 500 watts on both bands.
QUESTION: Can one install a capacitive hat directly below
the 80M trap to help shorten the length of the 80M section? For example,
shortening the 80M radiator to
60’ (from 65’) and making up ‘the difference’ with a capacity hat? Any
downside?
The only downside of adding capacitance below the trap is the chance of
increasing capacitance across the trap and changing trap tuning. If you just
keep the loading hat or wire away from the section above the trap, you
minimize that effect.
You really want the trap slightly up out of the 80 meter band to minimize
trap losses.
Almost anything can appear to work OK, but technically a trap of given
components handles the least power and has the highest loss when it is at or
very near resonance. If you did the trap resonance for 3.65 MHz, loss would
peak and power capability would be minimum right around that frequency. The
trap would have reduced loss and higher power rating as frequency moves away
from 3.65.
The loading wire or hat below the trap actually can decrease loss and
increase power rating of the system, so it isn't a bad idea if you also
minimize coupling to the area above the trap.
73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|