Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: JT65/JT9 MODES

To: "'Jim'" <wa3mej@comcast.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: JT65/JT9 MODES
From: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:19:13 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Amen!!

73,
Charlie, K4OTV


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:46 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: JT65/JT9 MODES



Alex, 

  I much imagine a similar statement was uttered many years ago when the first 
use of AM transmitters came into use and probably again when SSB came into use. 

Its not that it is better .... simply different and allows users to expand 
their avenues of experiencing ham radio.  I can tell you this however.. I can 
and have made contacts with 30 watts on JT65 that took me 1Kw to make on CW.. 
This has happened on several occasions from this station and within about 5 or 
10 minutes time and on Top Band to boot.. Play around experience all that ham 
radio has to offer don't worry about the mode... learn what works and   LET THE 
GOOD TIMES ROLL. 

Jim WA3MEJ 



<Hello brethren, 

<I?m ready to be crucified yet I couldn?t resist asking a question: 
<What's the value of JT modes qso for a dxer? 
<IMHO Digimodes undermine the value of low band dxing. I don't arfue over 
reliability of the modes and their help in extension <of hamradio capabilities 
in general yet JT and such do not require much from the operator. 

<With all due respect, 

<Alex 



Long Live Seal Team VI 

http://www.qsl.net/wa3mej/index.htm 
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>