| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower? |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:05:11 -0700 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 4/24/2014 8:00 AM, Carl wrote: On 160 there are no absolutes. There's at least one -- it's MUCH easier to work both locals and DX on 160 from New England than from California! Two reasons -- a LOT more locals within range of a mediocre antenna, and an all water path to EU, AF, and SA that doesn't go over the auroral region. In any contest, I could work more on 160 from Chicago with 100W and a low Tee vertical than I can with 1.5kW and full size verticals from NorCal. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Herbert Schoenbohm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Edward via Topband |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Tom W8JI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Suggestions for a tower?, Edward via Topband |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |