Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance

To: "'Tom W8JI'" <w8ji@w8ji.com>, "'Carl Braun'" <Carl.Braun@lairdtech.com>, "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:32:26 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Well, of course not, Tom! I need to be more precise and keep in mind the
"audience" on this Reflector, and that you are always lrking out thereinthe
weeds to chide and chastise me! :-) Of course devices that are pure real
over the frequency range of interest would not be resonant!  I guess I was
thinking of the more general case.like Carl's gamm match whose impedance
would consist of a real and imaginary part, in which case I stand by my
assertion.  Touche!  Mea culpa!  :-)

73,
Charlie, K4OTV



-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 9:10 PM
To: Charlie Cunningham; 'Carl Braun'; 'Joe Subich, W4TV'
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance

Subject: Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance - BTW Resonance


BTW "Resonance" =>  X=0 or jX = j0>>>

So my dummy load is resonant, and the resistors in my resistor bins are all 
resonant?   :-) 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>