To: | Top Band Contesting <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Question - optimum number of radials |
From: | James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:41:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Besides "optimim number(s)," I wonder if there is supporting analysis for the connection of the radial ends?? I have around 80 elevated radials that range from 50 foot lengths, running east and west, and 25 foot lengths running north and south (all of that a function of being geographically challenged). I have not tied the bitter ends together....never really thought about it when I put the radial field together but seem to recall reading something about tieing the ends together and having a well bounded complete "grid" underthe antenna. Thoughts? I tend to think it wouldn't hurt... 72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials, Bill Cromwell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials, Carl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials, Bill Cromwell |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Radials - open ended or tied together in a grid qrrtangement??, James Rodenkirch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |