Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues

To: Mike Greenway <K4PI@bellsouth.net>, topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues
From: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:29:57 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Absolutely! From what I see from my QTH in SW MO, 1845 would be a good
place for JT65 to move to. There is a ragchew group that meets on 1850, but
seldom is there much activity below that.

I seldom listen much above 1900. Maybe you're right, that would be a better
place. But they definitely need to move up, as there's often DX just below
them and we are just not going to get everyone to transmit a clean digital
signal.

By the way, Mike, it's easy to trim the large amount of text off the end of
your messages with Shift-Ctrl-End and then Delete. :-)  I've noticed others
here forgetting to do that lately, too.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com


On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mike Greenway <K4PI@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I don’t am still puzzled why the digital modes decided to use the 1837 to
> 1839 area with the size of the 160 M band. I know the SSB guys use a lot of
> the 1840-1900 area but 1900 to 2000 is usable isn’t it?  I rarely hear much
> up there and 3 or 4 khz up there would never be missed.  Probably not an
> answer but it has seemed strange to me since they started operating in that
> area.  Some of their signals are bone crushing and wide.  73 Mike K4PI
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>