Actually, Gary, if we triangulate using Victor's 150 deg bearing from
Carroll, Ohio and your 180 degree bearing from SE CT, we could plot an
intersection and figure out just about where the source is! I suspect that
the "modulation" that Tim said was too rapid for QSB is likely due to swells
and wave motion on the sea surface, and those carriers with no IDs may be
NDBs on buoys on drift nets.
73,
Charlie, K4OTV
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Smith
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:18 AM
To: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW
3.503.1 due south from SE CT.
3.501.6 due south from SE CT
73,
Gary
KA1J
> There appears to be a second carrier coming from the same direction
> on
> 3503.1. It is not as strong as the one on 3501.4. So whatever is
> going on -
> two steady carriers are on the low end of 80 CW.
>
> 73,
> Tim K3LR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Tim Duffy
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:45 PM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW
>
> I know this is the TopBand reflector - but there has been a carrier
> on
> 3501.4 for the past few days - that needs some DF work.
>
> It peaks at 150 degrees from K3LR so South South East. It is S9 this
> evening
>
> Any ideas on what it is and where it is coming from?
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Tim K3LR
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
|