Thanks for the link. I'm still wondering about NEC and its surface analysis.
I will have to find a more complete explanation of what it does. As I said
before, it sounded to me like all of the radiation-related parts of the
solution, both direct and reflected, had been mathematically separated, and
what was left was called the surface term. That is why it seemed odd to me
when it was suggested that it contributed to radiation. It now seems that
I'm simply misunderstanding the terminology. Thanks to everyone for your
patience.
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Anthony
Scandurra
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 16:30
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: More anecdotal "stories" to cause one to stop and....
Go to this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23847007/Radio-Engineers-Handbook-1943-Terman
...and then type page 686 at the box in the toolbar just above the page
display. It takes you to page 674 in the book.
73, Tony K4QE
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net> wrote:
> "AJ4SQ" wrote:
>
>> ... I'm only trying to understand what the model is doing, and what
>> it means by "surface wave."
>>
>
> Chapter 10 of RADIO ENGINEERS' HANDBOOK (1st Edition) by F. E. Terman
> has a good discussion of this beginning on page 674, but the page
> count on the subject is too much to link to here. Hope those
> interested can access it, somehow.
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
|