Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: CAT5 for Flag Antenna Feedline ?

To: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: CAT5 for Flag Antenna Feedline ?
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 12:17:04 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Would shielded CAT5 be useable as a Beverage feed? It would be easy enough to match with a binocular core at both ends and I just happen to have about 300' doing nothing.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 2:12 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: CAT5 for Flag Antenna Feedline ?


On 9/8/2013 10:30 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote:
I got the impression from the post
that CAT5 is immune to common mode noise.

I've not heard that, nor can I think of a theoretical basis for saying so. CAT5 is very good twisted pair, with a high twist ratio, Zo = 100 ohms, and its loss is low enough to make it work fine on 160M. The primary advantage of twisted pair is that it rejects DIFFERENTIAL mode noise. Rejection is greatest when both ends of the line are balanced.

One possible source of your confusion may be reading, but not fully understanding, my work, and Neil Muncy's work, on SCIN, whereby certain deficiencies in the construction of a cable shield convert common mode current to a differential voltage on the signal pair. I have on several occasions observed that high quality unshielded twisted pair, like CAT5/6/7, would have much better noise rejection than that sort of cable. Read about it in several tech papers and tutorials on my website. No need to burden the list with it.

73, Jim K9YC

_________________
Topband Reflector


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3222/6150 - Release Date: 09/09/13


_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>