| To: | "'D. S. Coleman'" <cwforever2@gmail.com>, <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Tree losses.... |
| From: | "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:04:32 -0600 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
The only way to say which location is better is to do a side by side comparison which didn't happen. You are making assumptions which may be wrong or may be right. Blaming it on trees is a guess. There are many other factors to consider. Doug -----Original Message----- It's hard to quantify all that, but operationally there is no question which installation gave the better results on Topband, by a fair margin. 73, Steve, AB4I _________________ Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Radio shopping and slightly off topic but...., John E Bastin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Effect of trees, ZR |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Tree losses...., D. S. Coleman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Tree losses...., D. S. Coleman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |