Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: dipole height

To: "K4SAV" <RadioIR@charter.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: dipole height
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:12:12 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
That's very true. Consider the K9AY. The RDF is about 7.7. Compare that to a 1 wavelength Beverage which is about 7.9 dB. The K9AY has a deep null in the 180 degree direction at the right elevation angle, but 45 degrees off that rear direction the signal is down only 10 dB. The RDF number is a W8JI creation and serves its purpose, while the DMF is an ON4UN creation and also has merit, but neither of these completely encompasses all the things you may need to know about a receiving antenna for your location. You have to use some common sense in junction with these numbers.

If noise or QRM is randomly distributed, RDF works perfectly.

If noise or QRM is predominantly only from a rear null area, DMF works perfectly.

If noise is off the front, all things are meaningless.


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>