Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: Tuning 160M Dipole

To: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: Tuning 160M Dipole
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:24:03 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
One of the benefits of modifying a rig for full range TX is finding where the lowest VSWR occurs to get a starting point for cutting or adding.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 8:07 PM
Subject: Topband: FW: Tuning 160M Dipole


I would rather guess you should short it by at least 4-6 foot per side.
Easiest way is to check for the resonant frequency and short accordingly.

73
Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of paul
ecker
Sent: Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 00:30
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Tuning 160M Dipole



I put up a 160m dipole but now need to tune it. SWR at low end of band is
abt 3 and at top end abt 5. From what I have read this means I need to
shorten it. My question is how much should I take off? A foot off each end?? Any good links to sites that may explain this in some detail so I can learn?

Tu and 73
Paul
kc2nyu
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5363 - Release Date: 10/30/12


_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>