Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Best angle of radiation ?
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:06:22 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Bruce-K1FZ wrote:
AM broadcast band antennas 5/8 & 1/2 wave tall are rarely used any more.
I noticed a reduction of the tall AM towers starting  about the 1960's.

Guy Olinger replied:
Wouldn't that have corresponded to the FCC's reduction in "clear-channel"
strategies, and more local market driven commercial agendas?

Class A (50 kW, non-directional, 24/7) AM broadcast stations use monopoles not much less than 180 degrees in electrical height. The most common height is 195 degrees, as that produces a groundwave field that isn't much less than from a 225-degree monopole, but the 195-degree height does not have the high-angle lobe of the 225-deg height that can cause nighttime fading/interference to its own groundwave at the fringe its groundwave signal.

Class A stations cannot use a monopole much shorter than 180 degrees, because they do not produce at least the minimum groundwave field required by the FCC for Class A stations.

And the whole point of the 1937 Brown, Lewis and Epstein study was that you DIDN"T need tall towers for daytime coverage.

The point of the BL&E study was to investigate the fields radiated by monopoles of various heights when using buried radial systems with wires of various length and number. They limited the heights of the monopoles they measured to about 98 degrees, as that height was sufficient to illustrate the effects of the various radial ground systems they used. In the best cases, the fields they measured were within several percent of the maximum field possible from a perfect monopole of that height when driven against a perfect ground plane.

If BL&E had used radiator heights to 5/8 WL then the fields they measured would have a new, higher reference value for a perfect monopole system of those heights. But again, in the best cases the measured fields would approach that new theoretical value within several percent.

Also note that even 1 kW, non-directional, 24/7, Class C AM stations may use tall towers if they want to improve their groundwave coverage areas. One such example is WSAM, 1400 kHz in Saginaw, MI, which uses a 180.4-degree monopole.

R. Fry
_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>