Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low Angles

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Low Angles
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:46:27 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Steve K0SR wrote:
...As I stand at the base of my mighty Butternut, I look in any direction and see obstructions. Cars, trucks, garages, hills, telephone poles, sheds, trash cans. The very base of my vertical can "see" about 40 feet away. What does that do to the radiation pattern of this antenna? ... My gut tells me I need higher angles of arrival or I'm out of business.

Probably the only objects in your list that would have a significant affect on radiation patterns would be telephone/power poles, if they have a wire running down the side of the pole connecting to a ground rod. Such scenarios are rather easy to model in NEC software to get some idea of their net effect.

On the lower bands, especially 160m, wavelengths are usually quite a bit larger than the vertical dimensions of even house-sized obstructions, so they don't have much affect on low-angle radiation from a monopole. The link below shows a fairly extreme example of this.

The groundwave fields of AM broadcast stations in the "expanded band" (1610-1700 kHz) can cross entire cities and still have very nearly the same value on the far side of them as if the cities weren't there. So radiation/reception by a monopole at elevation angles below 10 degrees also won't be much affected by those obstructions.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h85/rfry-100/Part-15_AM_WhipElevated_Frame.gif
_______________________________________________
Remember the PreStew coming on October 20th.  http://www.kkn.net/stew for more 
info.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>