Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages

To: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
From: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:08:26 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Sounds good to me. HI
Bill--W4BSG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
To: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>
Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages


>I figured that word would raise a flag. Lets say privately sharing the 
>results which leaves no footprints behind.
>
> Bottom line is that Id very much like to do a full evaluation and see if 
> it even comes close to warranting its high price. Mine seems to work 
> extremely well but Ive no "benchmark" to compare against.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>
> To: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; <herbs@vitelcom.net>
> Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
>
>
>> There is a BIG difference (Legally) between reverse Engineering for 
>> personal use, and publishing the results.
>> Bill--W4BSG
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
>> To: <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>> Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
>>
>>
>>> Has DXE actually made that claim publicly?
>>> I fail to see how they can stop anyone from reverse engineering for 
>>> personal
>>> use.
>>>
>>> I doubt they could even spell Customer Relations from reports Ive heard.
>>>
>>> Carl
>>> KM1H
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Herb Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>>> To: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
>>> Cc: <topband@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:12 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 5/23/2012 6:51 PM, ZR wrote:
>>>>> Is this box sealed in epoxy? Why hasnt someone reverse engineered it 
>>>>> and
>>>>> published the schematic?
>>>>> If anyone has a bad one send it to me; the least I can do is look at 
>>>>> it
>>>>> with a VNA or a GR bridge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carl
>>>>> KM1H
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The box is cast aluminum and relatively easy to take apart.  However 
>>>> DXE
>>>> appears not to wish a schematic publish nor do I want to do battle with
>>>> their attorneys as others have.  I would just like to talk to someone 
>>>> in
>>>> their customer relations department.  I have the box working but 
>>>> without
>>>> their support.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Herb, KV4FZ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2425/5018 - Release Date: 05/23/12
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: 05/24/12
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>