To: | "GeorgeWallner" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns) |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Mon, 7 May 2012 19:03:17 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
GeorgeWallner wrote: > I did that. I was testing a small dual-feed DHDL loop (-50 > dBi gain) using twisted pairs removed from a CAT 5 cable. > On the bench the twisted pair showed 100 ohm of impedance > and a loss of about 2.8 dB at 1.8 MHz on a 100' run. (I > also tried CAT 6. The results were the same. The I measured 1 dB per 100 feet at 1.8 MHz for my random sample of CAT5. Imagine the loss for 100 Mbit/s data! Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns), ZR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc, ZR |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns), ZR |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Using CAT5 in place of coax (was video baluns), Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |