Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern

To: <j_fitton@yahoo.com>, <w0uce@nc.rr.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern
From: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:25:09 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Yes, in retrospect, I'll assume that was a tongue in cheek 'view' of 72...,Hah, 
the laugh is on me!  71.5, Jim R. K9JWV

 

 

> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:09:38 -0700
> From: j_fitton@yahoo.com
> To: w0uce@nc.rr.com; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern
> 
> Jack,
> I am a diehard QRPer and an originator of the New England QRP club
> plus other stints in QRP officialdom and I really enjoyed your email
> especially the very clever 72, 73, and 74.
>  
> I try to lurk on the lists as a beginner on 160m but cannot help
> jumping in and posting sometimes.
>  
> Keep up the humor and know you are understood and appreciated by 
> the mostly silent,  majority.
>  
> 72 means "Happy QRPing" and was started by the ancient (and honorable)
> G-QRP club, one of the oldest QRP organizations around.
>  
> 72/73
>  
> jim / W1FMR
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> --- On Sun, 3/18/12, W0UCE <w0uce@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: W0UCE <w0uce@nc.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern
> To: "'James Rodenkirch'" <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>, jim@audiosystemsgroup.com, 
> topband@contesting.com
> Date: Sunday, March 18, 2012, 7:20 PM
> 
> 
> To All:
> 
> 
> 
> If I offended anyone with what was simply "having fun," as a muse" about
> "72, 73 and 74" I apologize. 
> 
> 
> 
> My post was not in any way intended to be negative toward anyone that cares
> to  operate QRP or any other power level or if they have the desire or feel
> the need to let everyone know their power level by adding /QRP, /QLP, /QRO
> or sending 72, 73, 74, 88 or even 73s.
> 
> 
> 
> Freedom of speech still prevails  so if / "Something or 72" is important
> just have at it.
> 
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of James Rodenkirch
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:03 PM
> To: w0uce@nc.rr.com; jim@audiosystemsgroup.com; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dang....can we GET away from an over-indulgence/concern over what's "said"
> or "typed"?
> 
> 
> 
> "72" is a form of radio shorthand that roughly translates as meaning "Best
> wishes QRP!"  
> 
> 
> 
> Been that way for a loooooong time, I do believe!  
> 
> 
> 
> Sheesh!  Does all of this PC ever END????
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: w0uce@nc.rr.com
> 
> > To: rodenkirch_llc@msn.com; jim@audiosystemsgroup.com;
> topband@contesting.com
> 
> > Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:56:29 -0400
> 
> > Subject: Topband: QRP Politically Correctness Concern
> 
> > 
> 
> > I notice people using "72" on the reflector which I assume to be a
> 
> > substitution for 73. 
> 
> > 
> 
> > By chance does 72 indicate "not so best wishes?
> 
> > 
> 
> > In observance of proper etiquette on Gentleman's Band and also be 
> 
> > "Properly Politically Correct" in today's troubled times perhaps 
> 
> > the numbers and meanings listed below should be considered appropriate:
> 
> > 
> 
> > QRP - 72
> 
> > Low Power - 73
> 
> > QRO: 74
> 
> > 
> 
> > 73 & sometimes 74,
> 
> > Jack
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > Great discussion on power and low power and QRP power and the affects Top
> 
> > Band have on 'em all - appreciate the various views and discussions. 72 to
> 
> > all, Jim R. K9JWV
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > > Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:14:26 -0700
> 
> > > From: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
> 
> > > To: topband@contesting.com
> 
> > > Subject: Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!!
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > On 3/18/2012 2:01 PM, James Rodenkirch wrote:
> 
> > > > Sounds like you and others might not be so keen on burying your ears
> in
> 
> > noise just to work a QRP puke like me, 'eh?
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > I'm not keen on listening for hours and hours with no activity. I have 
> 
> > > recently taken up a new challenge -- working JT65A on 160M. There's JT65
> 
> 
> > > activity almost every night at a dial frequency of 1838 kHz, which puts 
> 
> > > signals between about 1838.5 and 1840.5. The bandwidth of a signal is 
> 
> > > about 200 Hz, and stations spread out in that 2kHz bandwidth. It's not 
> 
> > > uncommon for me to decode five or six signals in that bandwidth when the
> 
> 
> > > band is hopping. The last couple of nights ZR1ADI has been on, and I 
> 
> > > heard a W1 work him. I heard him one of those nights and called him 
> 
> > > several times.
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > JT65 is pretty easy to use with W6CQZ's JT65-HF software. The interface 
> 
> > > is just like RTTY AFSK or PSK, and W6CQZ maintains a reverse beacon 
> 
> > > server that you can set his software to send spots for everything you 
> 
> > > hear. If I call CQ around 0500Z or later I'll usually see between 
> 
> > > three and six spots of my signal from the east coast on every
> 
> > transmission.
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > 73, Jim K9YC CM87
> 
> > > _______________________________________________
> 
> > > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
> > 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
> > 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
>                                 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
                                          
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>