Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now…

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: 2Wire, Inc. 3800HGV-B Gateway. RFI --Problem fixed for now….
From: Frank Davis <fdavis@nfld.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 12:27:08 -0330
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
In reply to Jim:

The CAT5 cable used with the 3800 modem is the one that came in the box with 
it.  The cable is very small diameter and very flexible...the modular plugs on 
it are smaller then the other plugs I have here on what i call regular CAT5 
cable. The regular CAT5 modular plugs will not plug unto the jack on the modem.
When that small flexible cable was wound on  the two stacked toroids that I 
used It was twisted in a couple of  places so maybe that contributed to the FEC 
events being seen by the telco test equipment.  The cable appears to be very 
cheap and a minimal attempt by the manufacturer to provide a cable for general 
use ...certainly not robust.

The toroids are not on this line now and all seems to be working fine.  The 
iMAc download speed testing within the BellAliant network is 6.6 mbps.  The 
full capacity of the line is supporting 4 IPTV set-top boxes two of which are 
HD.

Fibre Op coming within a few months to my area!

Frank VO1HP

> The BellAliant technician told me that placing the ferrites on the CAT5 
> feeding the modem caused  a significant number ( hundreds of '000's on a 
> continual basis.) of FEC (forward error correction) events to begin happening 
> on my line.

That does not make sense unless the CAT5 was mechanically distorted by 
the winding.  That would disturb the impedance at bit, but a LOT of 
errors doesn't make sense to me. The ferrites form a common mode choke, 
which the differential circuit should not see.

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>