Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Digital on 160m?

To: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Digital on 160m?
From: Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:03:08 +0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
>From the comments received, I  realize I should have made it clear that my
perspective comes from having a 160m band of only 40kHz (1810-1850), not
200 kHz like the US enjoys.

The bottom half of this 40kHz spectrum is more or less made unusable by
Fishing Buoy transmitters and there is a lot of Phony QRM in the upper half.

This is all  I wanted to point out.

These are emotional issues because we actually care.

For those willing to discuss these issues without much "moderation"  I have
expressed my views on my website where comments can be made to the post.

http://tf4m.com/archives/3057

73 Thor, TF4M

The Language of Amateur Radio is CW....




On 29 December 2011 18:56, Tree <tree@kkn.net> wrote:

> I would like to nip this thread in the bud if possible.
>
> This has proven to be a very emotional subject.
>
> I think it is safe to say that using digital modes is something some
> people enjoy - and something that other people do not.
>
> This is not something that is going to change with a lot of posts to
> this reflector.  Feel free to engage in emotional e-mails about it
> directly with the people who have made posts about it.  Doing so here
> on the reflector (after reading this) will result in you being put on
> the moderated list.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tree
>
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>