Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO

To: <deswynar@xplornet.ca>, Mark Langenfeld <lmlangenfeld@tds.net>
Subject: Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO
From: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:55:39 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I go out of my way to work the weak signals simply 'cuz I am a QRP operator and 
I'm always assuming a weak signal is a QRP station - sometimes, he/she isn't 
but they still want that QSO just as we do!

P.S.  I don't sign /QRP  - don't figure I need to and if THAT's what it takes 
to make a Q - fugeddaboutit!  Hi Hi

Jim R. K9JWV

 


> From: deswynar@xplornet.ca
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:43:40 -0500
> To: lmlangenfeld@tds.net
> CC: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: Nice QRP QSO
> 
> 
> On 2011-12-12, at 10:10 AM, lmlangenfeld tds.net wrote:
> > 
> > Sure, but the fact is, nobody forces anybody to dig out a QRP caller.  A
> > lot of QRP calls undoubtedly get ignored as too weak to bother with.  
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> That sort of logic on the part of some Hams, though no doubt true, just 
> completely escapes me...
> 
> I liken it to deliberately stepping over a shiny new quarter that one sees 
> lying on a sidewalk: money IS money, and the frugal person inside of me would 
> never, ever allow me to do such a thing as to step over it...ditto a weak 
> caller in a contest: a QRP participant is still worth points in a contest, so 
> why on earth would one ignore him simply because he might be weak...?
> 
> If anything, I personally go out of my way to work weak callers: it can be as 
> much a challenge for me, as it is for him! That's why whenever someone signs 
> their call with "/QRP" I'll strain to put him first in my log...
> 
> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
                                          
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>