| To: | topband@contesting.com, Jeff AC0C <jeff@ac0c.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:23:04 -0800 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 12/7/2011 6:15 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: > The flavour of the comments seems to be distilled as - the rules make it so > we (west coast) cannot realistically win - so we may as > well not come and play. Huh? The problem, Jeff, is that we're not even in the same contest! Superb operators at super-stations out here get beat by a factor of 10:1 by equivalent operators and stations on the east coast. But more to the point -- the scoring rules cause east coast guys to not want to work us because we aren't worth the trouble as compared to working EU. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments, Jeff Blaine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Best small space antennas, mstangelo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments, Jeff Blaine |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments, Eddy Swynar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |