To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: high take-off angle |
From: | "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca> |
Reply-to: | Bob Eldridge <r.c.eldridge@ieee.org> |
Date: | Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:25:55 -0700 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
>I dont understand the sudden urge or desire of some to suppress all >high angle radiation from an inverted L. It is well established that >even a low horizontal >dipole can work amazing amounts of DX on 160 when conditions allow >and >having both possibilities present in the L is a benefit. > Carl Hear! Hear! Especially at or near SR and SS. Bob VE7BS _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 106, Issue 17, Brian Miller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Receiver Frontend Protector?, Scott Long |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 106, Issue 17, Brian Miller |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: high take-off angle, Jan Erik Holm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |