Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again
From: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I second that!  I have been using the standard rg-6 ~$45/1000 ft box.  I have 
run over 1kw on 40, 80, and 160 with no problems what so ever.
 
I have been using the snap n seal style f connectors with the rg-6 - pl-259 
adapters....no prob's
 
it's a cheap alternative that has always worked for me.
 
Dave
KB8NNU
 
 


>________________________________
>From: John K9UWA <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
>To: topband@contesting.com
>Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 10:47 AM
>Subject: Re: Topband: RG-6 Coax again
>
>That would have been me Dave. I have been using Garden Variety RG6
>on my 160 array for well over 20 years. I tested a single run of it with a 
>pair 
>of heathkit dummy loads. Test piece of cable was 10 feet long with F 
>connectors to F-UHF adapters. Brick on the KEY on the Amp until the 
>Dummy loads started to smoke. Amp off and grabbed the coax. No heating 
>observed in the coax or the F connectors.
>
>John k9uwa
>
>> I think I saw someone talk about using RG-6 75 ohm coax at a full KW 
>> and F connectors on 160, but I cannot remember if it was on this 
>> reflector. I have some "high Quality" RG-6 cable with the "right" vp, 
>> but before trying this I would like to hear from someone who has 
>> successfully done this already.
>> 
>> Dave, W5UN
>
>John Goller, K9UWA & Jean Goller, N9PXF 
>Antique Radio Restorations
>k9uwa@arrl.net
>Visit our Web Site at:
>http://www.JohnJeanAntiqueRadio.com
>4836 Ranch Road
>Leo, IN 46765
>USA
>1-260-637-6426
>
>_______________________________________________
>UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>