| To: | topband@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Further to my previous: WAS 160 in three days? | 
| From: | Thorvaldur Stefansson <otradalur@gmail.com> | 
| Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:32:44 +0000 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
| hello all, a search of the archives revealed the call sign of a ND station who is indeed in my log ! I worked W0ZTL in ND on the 21st of November. He may not be a LOTW user, I will QSL direct to him. Once I have his QSL and Utah as well, WAS 160 is in the bag. :-) So I therefore claim WAS 160 in more or less one Month. I am surprised at the low level of LOTW usage among US stations, though, wish more users would sign up so the system has a chance to work. 73 Thor, TF4M -- "the language of 160M is CW" Lew, W7EW/W7AT _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: WAS 160 in three days?, Thorvaldur Stefansson | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Edger for burying ground radials ?, Craig Clark | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: WAS 160 in three days?, Thorvaldur Stefansson | 
| Next by Thread: | Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days, Thorvaldur Stefansson | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |