Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: QRQ vs QRS

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: QRQ vs QRS
From: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:03:36 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
> My experience is that it's usually easier to copy using QRQ (i.e. 20 -30
> WPM) as there are almost always QSB on DX signals. With slow speed it can be
> a hard time to be able to copy all the letters in the call before diving
> into a QSB valley...


Lars,

If I have a needed station who CQs in my face whenever I call, I will always
switch speeds a couple times before giving up.

I usually leave the keyer at 20WPM because that seems to be a good
compromise between QRS and having a hard time timing things out in pileups.

But I'll try faster or slower if I have trouble getting through... and will
QRQ if I find the station I'm trying to work has short, sharp fading.  I
think it's important to consider that slow speed might be hurting you
depending on condx.

73
Dan
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>