| To: | Garry <g.drummond@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted-L vs T Antenna |
| From: | "Herbert L. Schoenbohm" <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
| Reply-to: | herbs@vitelcom.net |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:49:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Garry wrote: > Is there any advantage in using an Inverted-L if you have to run it up a > tree where the vertical run is very close to the tree verses a "T" where > the vertical portion would be in the clear between two trees for supports? > > The "T" is preferable in most all cases since the amount of high angle > radiation is significantly reduced compared to an inverted L. > Herb, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: topband 160 CW, Bruce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Inverted-L vs T Antenna, Terry Conboy |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Inverted-L vs T Antenna, Garry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted-L vs T Antenna, Terry Conboy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |