| To: | "'Top Band Reflector'" <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange? |
| From: | "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:20:17 -0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I can see an advantage in using Q,L or H when calling CQ. If I was to come across a station signing /Q I would be much more inclined to make sure I worked him. Using power indicators in the exchange has problems. 73 Clive GM3POI _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Eric Hilding |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Joerg Vollbrecht |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Tod -MN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange?, Joerg Vollbrecht |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |