Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: I need a good idea...

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: I need a good idea...
From: <armin.ficza@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:51:27 +1300
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I am still not QRV on 160m. Previously, I got a many response from you,
and had a conclusion, that for my QTH, lazy H is the best option. 
I am a bit afraid to erect a new antenna becouse of the council rules,
my wife and neighbours. 
For me, the best option would be, if I could use my 80m vertical for
160m as well, or use the same supprt, or part of the support for 160m as
well.

So my 80m vertical is a standalone wire vertical, I put a 30 ft bamboo
to the top of the pine. Have 16 elevated radials, abt. 12 ft off the
ground.  The tree is in a small valley, abt 15 ft deep, with very slopy
terrain.  Becouse of that I had to use elevated radials...
So the measures : at 12 ft starts the vertical part, + 30 ft pine tree +
30ft bamboo. It survives 100 mph wind, not a problem. 
Question:
How to use this for 160m? I cannot use the top of the bamboo, for
anything. If there is a storm the whole tree moves, so guying is not an
option. If I guy the top, it will broke. I had an idea to put 4 elevated
radials, 40m each, and a trap at the place, where the bamboo starts, so
at 30 ft, and control it with a remote relay. Or, lazy H would be an
option? Use the same pine tree as support, and have 45 ft vertical
section? At 45 ft height, I can put more capacity wires... 

Thanks in advance,

Armin, ZL1KMN

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>