Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: RG-6 Coaxial Cable...

To: "TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: RG-6 Coaxial Cable...
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:22:18 -0700
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:53:03 +1200, armin.ficza@nokia.com wrote:

>I am just wondering, how do you handle the SWR issue with RG6? It is 75
>Ohm  cable.

First, the nominal resonant Z of a dipole in free space is much closer to 
75 ohms than 50 ohms. As a dipole gets closer to earth, its impedance tends 
to get lower, thanks to coupling to the earth. That makes it tend to be 
closer match to 50 than 75 ohms. Most practical 160 dipoles are low 
dipoles, and thus closer to 50 ohms than 75 ohms. 

Second, loss in transmission line due to a mismatch is negligible until the 
mismatch gets to be very high -- at least 5:1. See the ARRL Antenna Book 
and the ARRL Handbook. The worst case additional loss due to mismatch for a 
1.5:1 VSWR (the mismatch of 50 ohm load to a 75 ohm cable) is 0.18 dB, no 
matter how long the line or how lossy the cable is. 

So, even though 50 ohm cable might be a closer match to your 160 dipole, 
and 75 ohm cable is likely to be a better match to your 20/15/10 dipoles 
(because they're higher in terms of wavelength), the mismatch either way 
doesn't mean much. 

The beauty of 75 ohm cable designed for the MATV/CATV industry is that it 
is manufactured in FAR higher volume (probably 100x - 1,000x), and thus is 
FAR less expensive for equal quality and equivalent low loss. 

Jim Brown K9YC


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>