> -----Original Message-----
> From: topband-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of robert briggs
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 4:36 PM
> To: Topband
> Subject: Topband: Split frequency working
>
>
> I find that split frequency working unnecessary when working my evening
> Pacific DX.
> However when I am working Europe in the mornings the pileups are so intense
> sometimes that split is the only way to sort out contacts.I guess we are
> lucky
> in VK as there are very few operators on 160 which makes us "rare" DX these
> days.
After hearing some recordings of our PJ2T European pileups
recorded from the European side during CQWW CW, I'm
wondering whether I should set my reservations aside and
try split operation during contests, at least part of the
time. As with US pileups, stations continue calling when
they should be listening, and repeats are way too common
for best efficiency.
During non-contest periods, it's a no brainer - once the
pileup reaches a certain size, everyone benefits from
split operation.
With stations packed as tight as they are during the
upcoming CQWW 160 CW, I'm not at all sure it's practical
to use two frequencies at a time, and I know it wouldn't
be popular among others trying to carve out a little free
space on the band for their own pileup!
The alternative I'm trying from my end is to tack the call
of the station I'm calling to the end of each exchange as
well as to the beginning of the exchange during European
pileups.
73, Jeff K8ND
(To be PJ2T in CQWW 160 CW, January 28-29)
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|