| To: | <topband@contesting.com>, "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: shunt fed tower - question? |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:31:58 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> Changed my mind since it's not clear to me it would > help much. 35 kHz 2:1 BW is fine for my normal use. Would > go to a motorized shunt capacitor if I needed more BW. A "wider" shunt might increase BW, because it is certainly part of the overall selectivity or Q of the array. At some point, however, the parasitic elements will dominate the bandwidth. Maybe you are already at that point. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: shunt fed tower - question?, Tom Rauch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Noise, Craig Clark |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: shunt fed tower - question?, Bill Tippett |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: shunt fed tower - question?, Dennis OConnor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |