> It's time for the ARRL to quit treating 160 like an unwanted
> out-of-wedlock accident they are stuck with, and welcome it
> into the family with loving arms.
Getting down to specifics, what would you (and others) suggest?
Not to be an apologist for them, but they do publish John's and Jeff's books.
John's book, being more technical, probably has broader appeal, extending
beyond the amateur community, and has likely done well for them. I say that
because it has gone through several editions. As interesting as Jeff's book is,
it probably isn't a big money-maker, but they took a shot at it. I sense they
are not doing very well financially right now, which makes publishing such an
esoteric book even more remarkable. I say esoteric only because you are right,
160 is not considered a 'normal' band by most hams.
That's why I am interested in seeing information that will get more hams to at
least try 160. My previous comments re the Devoldere book were not an
indictment of the book, which is excellent. But being the main text on 160, I
think many hams who bother to look at it will be overwhelmed. The wavelength
and propagation anomalies make it necessary to use fairly large antennas to
work lots of DX, but you _can_ make contacts with what most topbanders would
consider inferior antennas. Getting people to at least try, by presenting
information about small-scale antennas, will no doubt induce a handful to go on
to build better stations. Not many people with zero experience on 160 are
likely to start out with even a K9AY antenna for receiving.
Remember, most of us started out as crystal-controlled Novices, running QRP and
low wire antennas. We evolved, but we started out small. Some couldn't cut it
and quit, but the bug bit many of us hard enough to encourage us to improve our
stations and operating skills. I think the same model could be applied to 160.
Not everyone who gives it a try will stick around, but some will. The trick is
to get them on 160 in the first place.
I wish someone on this reflector would try to publish a QST article on the
order of "Getting Started on 160." The emphasis I would like to see is that,
"Yes, bigger is always better, but there are enough big stations on 160 that
you can make contacts with even modest antennas." If such an article were
published a month or so before the ARRL 160 contest, when there are many U.S.
stations on the band, it might snare a few newcomers. Your experience and
accomplishments on 160 would provide the bonafides needed to give the article
credibility. You don't have to make it look easy, but you can make it look
challenging and worthwhile without making it look overly difficult. Perhaps
include a couple of anecdotal sidebars from hams working from small lots. This
article would also be a good place to revisit DX windows, as it will be read by
anyone with an interest in 160, including those already on the band. As a
former QST and ARRL book editor and author I would be happy to help in an
y way.
73,
Jim, KR1S
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|