Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Bird Meter

To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>,"Ron Majewski" <bigsky2000@sbcglobal.net>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Bird Meter
From: "Mauri" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:46:01 +0200
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Bird 43 is a useful instrument, and I agree with your points about 
directional coupler meters advantages. Sensors, diodes or thermocouples 
(bolometers) have instead pros and cons.
It remains the fact that also in Bird wattmeter, if one does not subtract 
the reflected power from the forward reading, in event of large SWR, the 
error is much bigger than 5% of plugin fs.
With an SWR of 1:6 vswr, the reflected power is 36%. FW scale reading is 
thus 36% larger than (real power to load), to which adds the instrument 
error.
In case of SWR, even subtracting the reflected power to the forward, the 
instrument precision is not 5% but something else, since also reflected 
reading suffers the same.
When the plug in is simply reversed (the most common event) the final 
precision is 10% of fs.

73,
Mauri I4JMY


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>