Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re:Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top?

To: "k2wh" <k2wh@optonline.net>
Subject: Re:Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top?
From: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:01:22 +0200
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
If the hat has the purpose of substantially loading a short element in the most 
efficient possible way, then it has to be at the top of the element.
If the hat has instead the purpose of loading an element whose lenght (phisical 
or electrical) is already close to resonance, in other words if the hat is 
small, then the hat works like a fine tuning device, without affecting in 
practice the antenna performances/characteristics.
Because of the above, when the hat is small, or better to say when the loading 
required for final antenna resonance is not big, the position of the hat is not 
necessarily at the extreme top of the element.

73,
Mauri I4JMY

>
> My question is:  Does a tophat always have to be at the top?  Or could
> it be a "Collar", half way
> up the vertical and maybe called a "Scarf"?
>
> K2WH


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>