| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: one inv l for 160/80 |
| From: | "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:01:15 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
A while back someone wrote about using a 165' inv l ( 3/8w on 160 and 3/4w on 80m). How does the radiation patterm compare to a 1/4w. Which would be better for dx work? _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 1996 NCJ Article, Larry Emery |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Topband: Pennant Transformer, Kyle Chavis |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 1996 NCJ Article, Larry Emery |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: Aluminum Pipe, Ed Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |