At 07:37 PM 12/28/00 -0500, Tom Rauch wrote:
>Assuming your noise is mostly sky-wave, you give up S/N
>advantage pretty quick as spacing gets to 1/2 wl (and especially
>anything narrower). If the noise is groundwave, very far from the
>antenna (a few thousand feet or more), and directly off the sides
>1/2 wl spacing may be useful.
*The offending noise is all ground-wave. Locally generated, ranging from a
little over a wavelength to a couple miles away. Seems like most folks
assume the offending signals are sky-wave. But remember, if you have to
resort to a small RX antenna like this, chances are your QTH is buried in
urban noise, all locally generated. I can only dream of a QTH where
sky-wave is the problem!
>I use 330 ft or more on most broadside arrays. With sky-wave
>noise, there is a big advantage that is clearly heard when I
>compare two antennas at 1/2 wl and two at 330 ft spacing. Maybe
>you should use the wide spacing and get a phase shift system that
>lets you steer the main lobe.
With the 315 foot spacing, there is no discernable advantage over a single
flag. I can do A-B switching and the differences average out. There is a
slight advantage when looking at AM stations in the top end of the AM band,
hence my thought that narrower spacing might be better in this application.
A good phase shifter is planned (NOT a MFJ!) for a future project. It would
seem that is indeed the best answer. But that's several weeks in the
future, at best.
73,
Larry - W7IUV
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/topband
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|