Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions
From: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 13:50:10 -0500
I think Art has the answer.

On the recent poor nights to Europe, moving up 40 and even 20 is wide open
to the normal 160 path.

> manage, where there once was 160 and 80 meter Q's , have now been 
> replace with 40 and 20 meter Q's in the same time frame and occasionally 
> 15 meters. This would lead one to believe that the MUF is staying too 
> high to support GOOD 160 meter propagation.

As the solar flux goes up, I always expect 160 to suffer. It is, however,
still quite good on some paths on some days. It's just a matter of people
being there on both ends. 

73 Tom

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>