Has anyone had an opportunity to compare the "K3LR" switched sloping dipole
configuration with a quarter-wave vertical using 100+ radials? To me, if
one only had a 180-foot support <g>, this would make for the "ultimate"
160-meter transmitting antenna.
-Paul, W9AC
-----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Weiss <ozling@web4you.dk>
To: topband@contesting.com <topband@contesting.com>; Bob Eldridge
<eldridge@direct.ca>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, March 13, 1998 4:06 PM
Subject: Sv: TopBand: elevated radials
>Right Bob,
>I am wondering how fairly low dipoles ( at 90 ') performs so well compared
to verticals at times (ask N6TR/7). How high is your dipole tree ?
>
>Henrik OZ1ING
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: Bob Eldridge <eldridge@direct.ca>
>Til: topband@contesting.com <topband@contesting.com>
>Dato: 10. marts 1998 00:20
>Emne: TopBand: elevated radials
>
>
>>Here's one reader that's not falling asleep.
>>
>>I'm only too pleased to 'read the mail' on the technical part of the
>>argument, while rather afraid the administrator may have to remonstrate
>>about the personal digs.
>>
>>Keep it up please, but like gentlemen.
>>
>>About low angles and K1ZM/VE1ZZ success and sea water: I don't know what
is
>>proved. I don't know whether it is the low angle part or the higher angle
>>part of the lobe doing the job.
>>
>>73 de VE7BS
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
>>Submissions: topband@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
>Submissions: topband@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|