Just received a very similar email from a 6 meter group. tnx John.
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 12:00 PM, "tentec-request@contesting.com"
> <tentec-request@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
> tentec@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tentec-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tentec-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Reflector Op-eds (k8mp@aol.com)
> 2. Omni D 160 (Michael Hutchison)
> 3. Re: Omni D 160 (Mike Bryce)
> 4. Re: Omni D 160 (Steve Ellington)
> 5. Re: Argonaut VI (rick@dj0ip.de)
> 6. Re: Current Firmware (Vic Klein)
> 7. Phishing Attempt on list members (Bill Cotter)
> 8. Re: Phishing Attempt on list members (rick@dj0ip.de)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:36:47 -0500
> From: k8mp@aol.com
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Cc: oldlongbeard@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
> Message-ID: <15aa6695f03-1fd9-170b2@webprd-m64.mail.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Glad you got 'er done Greg!
>
> Seeya, Joe. K8MP
>
> Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Cc: oldlongbeard <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 07:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
>
>
>
>
> Joe, et al, a big thank you for the instructions on the TenTec wiki page on
> how to replace the relays on the low pass filter board in the Omni VI/+! I
> tackled mine last weekend, and it was very easy using your instructions. She
> will get the roofing filter installed next, then, the I.F. filter tap for a
> pan adapter. (Thanks to Barry, N1EU, as well!!). YES, this IS the place for
> tech questions!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg Schippers, KC8HXO
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2017 at 16:00, <Joe Papworth via TenTec (<a
>> href="mailto:tentec@contesting.com?";>mailto:tentec@contesting.com</a>)>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>> This is definitely the place for Ten Tec techie stuff. I've been bailed out
>> by the smart guys on here more than once.
>> My comments were regarding all the non-techie opinion type stuff which can
>> get old.
>>
>> Seeya, Joe, K8MP
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Howard w0ep <<a href="mailto:w0ep@w0ep.us";>w0ep@w0ep.us</a>>
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <<a
>> href="mailto:tentec@contesting.com";>tentec@contesting.com</a>>
>> Sent: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 2:59 pm
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
>>
>>
>> Is there a better place to ask the technical questions?
>> I'm happy to go elsewhere if that's what I should do.
>>
>> I have a TS-820 that I literally brought back from the dead with
>> the help of the TS-520/820/530/830 group on yahoo. I'm happy
>> to admit that I'm on the pull-it-out-of-the-dumpster end
>> of ham radio. I won't be calling TenTec support or buying
>> their new radios. Not that I don't want to, but I don't have
>> the resources to commit to that.
>>
>> So, if there is a more appropriate place, just point me in the right
>> direction.
>>
>>
>> Chris
>> w0ep
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 3/5/2017 7:28 AM, Joe Papworth via TenTec wrote:
>>> There are too many posts on here of people's opinions. One guy throws
>>> something out and it escalates from there.
>>> On the other hand, guys ask technical questions and they sometimes go
>>> unanswered.
>>> Can we strike a balance?
>>>
>>> Later, Joe, K8MP
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> <a href="mailto:TenTec@contesting.com";>TenTec@contesting.com</a>
>>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec";
>>> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:TenTec@contesting.com";>TenTec@contesting.com</a>
>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec";
>> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:TenTec@contesting.com";>TenTec@contesting.com</a>
>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec";
>> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> <a href="mailto:TenTec@contesting.com";>TenTec@contesting.com</a>
> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec";
> target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:03:15 +0000
> From: Michael Hutchison <mhutchers@msn.com>
> To: "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID:
>
> <CY4PR03MB24721CBCF6E45D0950EA6F9DAE2F0@CY4PR03MB2472.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I go
> to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands
> ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:48:57 -0500
> From: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID: <9493C6E2-A1D5-4829-827F-C95AF5C8955D@sssnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> heterodyne mixer crystal is not working. either bad or loose
>
> Common trouble with the omni series.
>
> Try removing the crystal, spray the sockets with deoxit . Also, try and crimp
> the socket a bit to tighten their grip
>
> mike, wb8vge
>
>
> Mike Bryce
> prosolar@sssnet.com
>
>
>
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Michael Hutchison <mhutchers@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I go
>> to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands
>> ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:14:45 -0500
> From: Steve Ellington <steven4lq@gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID:
> <CAHBT4RtyTnoESUyUTMXk4ibr3rbuaCQGMxJbcJddQqfMUEs4KQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Did it ever work on 160 since you've had it? Is the crystal even there??
>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> heterodyne mixer crystal is not working. either bad or loose
>>
>> Common trouble with the omni series.
>>
>> Try removing the crystal, spray the sockets with deoxit . Also, try and
>> crimp the socket a bit to tighten their grip
>>
>> mike, wb8vge
>>
>>
>> Mike Bryce
>> prosolar@sssnet.com
>>
>>
>>
>>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Michael Hutchison <mhutchers@msn.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I
>> go to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands
>> ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:02:00 +0100
> From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
> Message-ID: <002201d29719$1b119780$5134c680$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes, the Argo is a fine QRP radio.
>
> I regret that I don't have one.
> I "almost" got an Argo6.
>
> 2 years ago at the hamfest in Friedrichshafen we had one last Argo6 in stock
> and on display on our booth. I said "if nobody buy it before the end of the
> hamfest, I will." On the 3rd day about one hour before the end of the
> hamfest, an OM from HB0 bought it. <<sniff>>
>
> After that we placed more stock orders for Argo6, Eagle, 418, and OM7 but
> never received any more radios from Ten-Tec again.
>
> In the meantime, the Euro has taken a dive against the $$$, which has caused
> everything imported for America to be about 25 to 30% more expensive than
> they were before. Keep in mind we were already 30 or 35% more expensive that
> the stateside price, so that has really put a damper on our ability to sell
> US-made equipment over here.
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of tim
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 12:54 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am afraid I was one of those who was some what vocal about adding 160m
> and leaving out 12m. I am aware that TT received positive comments about
> adding 160. One comment I had was that I could just see all those SOTA guys
> climbing to the top of a mountain and putting up their 160 meter inverted V
> or vertical/end fed. Hehehe.
>
> Still it was a good radio with a fabulous receiver. Would I buy another with
> 12 meters? Yes, but an Omni and Rebel are higher on the list.
>
>
> Tim
> KE4KE
>
>
>
>> On 03/06/2017 04:33 PM, rick@dj0ip.de wrote:
>> Mike, I explained how both versions can be true.
>> Jack and I still exchange emails regularly.
>> I KNOW why 12m was not in the radio. We discussed this and I told he for a
>> QRP radio, it would have been better to leave out 160m. Of course
>> contesters would disagree.
>>
>> As I said, it might also be deemed a cost issue because they would have
>> needed to get a larger box.
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Bryce
>> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 8:37 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
>>
>> rick,
>>
>> that?s the story I got from John Henry.
>>
>> I was one of the beta tester for that rig and that question came up right
>> from the start. Where were 60 and 12 meters. That?s what John Heny told the
>> group of beta testers.
>>
>> If and when Mike gets the Argonaut VI back into production, from my point of
>> view, I?d go with 60 meters and forget 12?.but that?s just me
>>
>> Mike, WB8VGE
>>
>> Mike Bryce, WB8VGE
>> the heathkit shop
>> SunLight energy systems
>> J e e p
>> o|||||||o
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:41 PM, rick@dj0ip.de <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually it had nothing directly to do with cost.
>>> The reason those bands are not in the radio is, there was no space to
>>> place the bandpass filters.
>>> Of course they could have found a larger box, which would have cost
>>> more, so maybe that's the reason John said "cost".
>>>
>>> According to Jack in a private conversation we had, in order to make
>>> space for another band, he would have had to reduce the size of the
>>> cores of the BPF inductors, which would slightly reduce their
>>> performance, so he opted to leave 12m out. We never spoke about 60m.
>>>
>>> According to Mike in a private telephone conversation with me, the new
>>> Argo6's will have 12m. I don't think he commented on 60m. And he did
>>> not say how they are doing it but if he says 12m is in, then I have no
>>> reason to doubt him.
>>>
>>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>>> (ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:06:23 -0500
> From: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Current Firmware
> Message-ID: <000c01d29732$dbc4c330$934e4990$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> The last Omni VII firmware version is 1.037 which was posted by John Henry
> on the Yahoo Omni VII site. The last one on the Ten Tec site is 1.036, which
> had a small bug in the handling of remote CW memories that John fixed in the
> one on the Yahoo site. Both use an installer which makes it pretty easy, but
> that said I was unable to do it with just a serial port connection. John
> suggested I install through the Ethernet port, and that worked perfectly.
> All the rest of the software listed with the Omni VII product description on
> the tentec.com site is current.
>
>
>
> =Vic=
>
> WA4THR
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
>
>
> To:
>
> tentec@contesting.com <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com>
>
>
> Subject:
>
> [TenTec] Current Firmware
>
>
> From:
>
> Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net <mailto:wn3vaw%40verizon.net> >
>
>
> Reply-to:
>
> Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com
> <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com> >
>
>
> Date:
>
> Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:48:27 -0600 (CST)
>
>
> List-post:
>
> <tentec@contesting.com <mailto:%3Ca%20href=> ">mailto:tentec@contesting.com
> <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com> >
>
>
> Good morning all,
>
>
>
>
>
> Quick question... has anyone on the list done a recent Omni VII firmware
>
> upgrade from the files currently on the "new" Ten Tec site?
>
>
>
>
>
> If so, any issues or anything to watch out for?
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd thought I'd downloaded the files years ago from the old RFSquared site;
> if
>
> I did, they've been misplaced in the last shack computer updated. I've now
>
> been advised that some issues I ran into during the contest this last
> weekend
>
> might indicate I need to update the firmware, and I before I do so, well,
> I'd
>
> prefer to avoid issues ahead of time. (And I can load the firmware from an
> old
>
> XP laptop, since I've heard some have had issues with Win 7)
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:24:32 -0500
> From: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
> Message-ID: <20170307162439.ECCE5AC9B03@mx.contesting.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Beware of the phishing attempt you may receive (see below). Someone
> has harvested names from this list and is targeting "ETO_Alpha" and
> "TenTec" members.
>
> 73 Bill N4LG
>
>
>
>
>> Delivered-To: n4lg@qx.net
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=qth.net;
>> s=default;
>> t=1488899182;
>> bh=2q8mJcsT+JP7sIr32C+G52Q2fbL7ZUtns79YrzTvk0g=;
>>
>> h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
>> List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc;
>>
>> b=maFKnA6WbwlNMqkuKcYepgSU9OMStJgY7IrcBmCZdHlHj/ELHfyMtS66GX4hlNREm
>>
>> C06nVH19x7Xsa82g8P4iD2drI+T6Y+Ws++1lbbmm61nV4Ud+FOYF18VKRIuBgUzrCd
>> XxZC9QNe6q6v77JYpWQXWUlJv6sggae0X+z0xDZM=
>> X-Original-To: eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net
>> Delivered-To: eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net
>> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:04:30 +0900
>> To: eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net
>> X-Sender-Warning: www.cep.co.jp has no MX records
>> X-Sender-Warning: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 210.255.105.34
>> (deferred)
>> X-SpamExperts-Class: unsure
>> X-SpamExperts-Evidence: Combined (0.85)
>> X-Recommended-Action: accept
>> X-Filter-ID:
>> s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZpY1ikLiFgbVmksaMuwG0C5OxuSEtuFWwwaLyTv3J4q92PNDpgLsd6D
>>
>> dd/s7VM53g3T+DSfEwaX1fMB91s1i0eF3rqxKFd/nPW1dGGCWU27VYc7hTwcygp99vNHI1A0PI9k
>>
>> qIVyJCaIhM768GQfA9/4JGAMHFcVQyGQV1YVAWCkHHASJNUmoOHSoqgqxfHmWWFKriOvK5c3NjZx
>>
>> hn31ZU4XXoJpPBs4SXre2qkDo6tZnxyFa+Q+jcWWki4nd/MNUQioT+LYyf+F84tisMSPnVK7RuLD
>>
>> 0cO47gH2HJlBchoL647lNwN4qOsSZg+fYhVZG6JgW08GUKyIRv5R4YS10xebidA8HjwZkZUDJOsO
>>
>> TC4gLPcreuTRO8h4kE9NVybyZjW4m2RFNwnqNAb/sRVZUsobuA68LiYaufnE2X20a92NAs6k3Y4z
>>
>> hdrc7mVMTsXqUoUqJg7F2WHEjt37MS2lIdOrf/zvkfJ5qxZ6Hdc351pSh/Q9kPA7nEm8yCUrkAIp
>>
>> zU0HC+OHo93JT2u4lL5dx5YjZwWTcp0rVeO1dO6omiH/21XAikGmQzbz+8y1rHkBAO56plfq0eVU
>>
>> aVfwajC1K+JsJP8LNZ+wb8Fh6AzaRQJBMtwBgiVFxbzJQf+pUBa+8CGwfqeNO0Vta0QHISXmTwUu
>>
>> LKQ+ubjvZxdX/Mk3mf2JSr4HXZ2fULtXUdtZdiUjUGrQb3qPqhqT+JdhmUwb5ih9gqLsGblhZTuo
>> ottz/Xz3
>> X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine4.antispamcloud.com
>> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
>> Subject: [ETO_Alpha] Account Suspension
>> X-BeenThere: eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
>> List-Id: Discussion of ETO Alpha <eto_alpha.mailman.qth.net>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/eto_alpha>,
>>
>> <mailto:eto_alpha-request@mailman.qth.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/eto_alpha/>
>> List-Post: <mailto:eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net>
>> List-Help: <mailto:eto_alpha-request@mailman.qth.net?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha>,
>> <mailto:eto_alpha-request@mailman.qth.net?subject=subscribe>
>> From: "Chase AcctSec. Team chasesecurity-team_noreplies--- via
>> ETO_Alpha"
>> <eto_alpha@mailman.qth.net>
>> Reply-To: alt.y7-fdeawx2@yopmail.com
>> Cc: "Chase AcctSec. Team chasesecurity-team_noreplies@chse.com"
>> <cosmophone@yahoo.com>
>> Sender: "ETO_Alpha" <eto_alpha-bounces@mailman.qth.net>
>> X-MagicMail-OS: Inactive
>> X-MagicMail-UUID: a09ea8bc-0347-11e7-98bf-0019bb366edc
>> X-MagicMail-SourceIP: 69.16.227.189
>> X-MagicMail-EnvelopeFrom: <eto_alpha-bounces@mailman.qth.net>
>> X-MagicMail-Whitelisted: Yes
>>
>> Hi,
>> Due to a recent compromise of our servers by some chinese hackers,
>> It has
>> been mandated that we carry out an integrity check to isolate and
>> disable
>> all
>> suspicious accounts. For now we have already placed a red flag on
>> several
>> accounts
>> thereby preventing them from carrying out any financial transactions
>> whatsoever.
>> To ensure that your account was not compromised, you are required to
>> ascertain
>> your identity, failure to do this within 24 hours will lead to account
>> service
>> suspension.
>> Login and Ascertain Your Identity
>> Thanks for your anticipated co-operation and understanding.
>> The Accounts Team,
>> For Chase Online
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ETO_Alpha mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ETO_Alpha@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:33:21 +0100
> From: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
> Message-ID: <001501d29760$8940ddf0$9bc299d0$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Bill,
>
> You beat me to the punch.
> I was just about to post a message, warning about the same type of message
> that I received through the Argonaut Group (also contesting.com group).
> I haven't seen any email traffic on that group for months, and now this
> email came.
>
> Here is the FULL TEXT of the email:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Hi,
> Due to a recent compromise of our servers by some chinese hackers, It has
> been mandated that we carry out an integrity check to isolate and disable
> all suspicious accounts. For now we have already placed a red flag on
> several accounts thereby preventing them from carrying out any financial
> transactions whatsoever.
> To ensure that your account was not compromised, you are required to
> ascertain your identity, failure to do this within 24 hours will lead to
> account service suspension.
> Login and Ascertain Your Identity
>
> [ DANGEROUS LINK REMOVED ]
>
> Thanks for your anticipated co-operation and understanding.
> The Accounts Team,
> For Chase Online
> ______________________________________________________________
> Argonaut_USERS_Group mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/argonaut_users_group
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Argonaut_USERS_Group@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> DELETE THIS TYPE OF EMAIL IMMEDIATELY!
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Cotter
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 5:25 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
>
> Beware of the phishing attempt you may receive (see below). Someone has
> harvested names from this list and is targeting "ETO_Alpha" and "TenTec"
> members.
>
> 73 Bill N4LG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TenTec Digest, Vol 171, Issue 14
> ***************************************
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|